Very Extensive Crankshaft and Block Repair on a Passenger Ferry

Overview

QuantiServ recently completed a large-scale repair assignment on a passenger ferry. The ferry was built in the year 2000 and is equipped with four 12-cylinder, 46-bore main engines, with a nominal power output of 12.6 MW each.

In early 2024, two of these engines required extensive repairs, having each accumulated over 120,000 running hours and having suffered a recent failure.

QuantiServ was contracted to carry out the repair of both engines. As additional defects were found during the repair, the work turned into a sizeable project that took almost four months to complete.

Our in-situ machining specialists from Sweden carried out all work during the winter months of 2023/2024, while the vessel was out of operation during the low season.

One of the two crankshafts was removed from the engine and underwent repair on the vessel's car deck.
One of the two crankshafts was removed from the engine and underwent repair on the vessel's car deck.

Damage

The following damages were found. They were all addressed by our specialists during the repair.

Engine Number 1

  • Crankpin bearing failure
  • As a consequence: Multiple cracks, excessive surface hardness of 600 – 680 HB

Engine Number 2

  • Failure of four crankpin bearings
  • Crankshaft bent
  • Failure of one adjacent main bearing
  •  A collapsed main bearing saddle, as a consequence of the heat generated
  • Poor fitting of another bearing saddle
  • Severe cam effect on all other crankpins
Multitude of cracks in the crankpin journal
After cutting off some material from the crankpin, a multitude of cracks became visible. They were caused by the rapid temperature raise and fall during the bearing failure.
In-process hardness measurement during machining. The areas with increased hardness are easily visible.
In-process hardness measurement during machining. The dramatic temperature changes resulted in changes in the local microstructure that are easily visible.
Surface hardness of up to 680 HB following the failure. The acceptable limit is 300 HB.
Due to excessive heat generated by the failed bearing, the surface hardness had increased to 600 - 680 HB. The acceptable upper limit is 300 HB.

Detailed Work Performed

All repair works was done while the vessel was berthed during low season.

Engine Number 1

Crankshaft Repairs:

  • Heat Treatment and Machining: One crankpin was machined to an undersize of -3.00 mm.
  • Polishing: Two main bearings were polished to ensure smooth operation.

Engine Number 2

Due to damage found on the engine block, the crankshaft was removed so that line boring on the block could be carried out. Heat treatment and in-situ machining on the crankshaft was carried out on the vessel’s car deck.

Crankshaft Repairs:

  • Heat Treatment: Four crankpins and one main journal underwent heat treatment.
  • Machining: The treated components were machined to undersize diameters ranging from -2.00 to -5.00 mm, depending on their condition.
  • Straightening: The crankshaft, found bent with a run-out of 1.50 mm, required peening (in-situ straightening).
  • Polishing: All main journals and crankpins, exhibiting strong indications of the “cam effect,” were polished.

Engine Block Repairs:

  • Bearing Saddle Realignment: The overheating of one main bearing caused misalignment, necessitating the replacement of the bearing cap and subsequent line boring.
  • Bearing Cap Adjustment: Another main bearing cap showing a gap with the cylinder block was corrected.

Additional Improvements

In addition to the primary repair tasks, QuantiServ addressed machining work previously carried out by another company on some of the crankpins. The fillets were not nicely cut, and the radius around the oil hole needed improvement. Our specialists refined these areas, ensuring optimal performance and longevity of the crankshafts.

Summary Table of Work Done

 

Engine Work done
# 1 Heat treatment and machining to -3.00 mm undersize of one crankpin
Polishing of two main bearings
# 2 Removal of the crankshaft for external heat treatment and in-situ machining
Machining to undersize diameters of -2.00 to -5.00 mm
Peening (in-situ straighening) to correct a bent crankshaft with 1.50 mm run-out
Polishing of all main journals and crankpins
Replacement of a bearing cap and line boring due to misalignment
Adjustment of a main bearing cap gap with the cylinder block
One of totally five crankpins that our specialists machined to under-size
One of totally five crankpins that our specialists machined to under-size
The mirror-like finishing on one of the crankpins.
Impressive, mirror-like finishing after polishing of the crankpins.

Conclusion

This extensive in-situ repair project on a passenger ferry highlights QuantiServ’s expertise and ability to perform critical repairs without interrupting service.

The phenomena known as “cam effect” or “ridge wear” could be identified as reason for the bearing failures and the ensuing, rather extensive and therefore costly, repairs. It is therefore very important that ship owners and operators are sensitive to this issue and regularly check the condition of the crankpins once their engines have surpassed aproximately 60,000 running hours.

Has your four-stroke engine accumulated around 60,000 running hours or more?

Although the crankpins might appear to be in good condition, it is very likely that they suffer from the cam effect (also known as ridge wear) and are in need of machine polishing. If this is not done, then you might face a failure soon!

Read more

Metal Stitching an Engine Block from 1921 in-situ!

1921 Duesenberg Model A

We do a lot of in-situ work. We routinely carry out machining and metal stitching work, among others, on components that are too large to be moved to a workshop or where dismantling work is too time consuming or costly. But repairing a an antique car engine block, in the chassis, in a museum, is still quite special. Even for us.

The engine in question is an in-line, eight cylinder one with a bore of 72 mm and a stroke of 125 mm (2.875″ x 5″). With a swept volume of 4’256 cc, or 260 cubic inches, this early Duesenberg Model A engine is capable of producing up to 88 hp (66 kW) of power.

Repair in progress. The engine remained in the chassis, only the cylinder head was removed.
Repair in progress. The engine remained in the chassis, only the cylinder head was removed.

We got the opportunity to work on this engine as cracks had began to show at the corners of the engine block. The cracks originated from the threaded bores housing the cylinder head studs. They extended towards the outside of the engine block on one side and into the cooling water passage on the other.

The fact that the engine was left inside the chassis made the repair a little more challenging than usual. Our metal stitching expert had to use a mirror for much of the repair work. Without it he could not see, let alone repair the cracks at the rear end of the engine block. In addition to sealing the cracks with stitching pins, our expert also installed Full Torque™ thread inserts at the threaded bores. Unlike conventional thread repair inserts, Full Torque™ inserts do not create spreading forces. They are therefore the perfect solution for cases like this one, where threaded bores close to an edge have to be repaired.

Cracks extending from the cylinder head stud bores to the outside and to the cooling water space
Cracks extending from the cylinder head stud bores to the outside and to the cooling water space
Installation of Castmaster stitching pins.
Installation of Castmaster stitching pins. They are the strongest and most advanced stitching pins on the market today.
Ultrasonic inspection of the casting
Ultrasonic inspection of the casting to determine the wall thickness
Metal stitching in progress. Due to the location of the crack a mirror was used.
Metal stitching in progress. Due to the location of the crack a mirror was used.
The completed repair. Cracks stitched and Full Torque thread inserts installed.
The completed repair. Cracks stitched and Full Torque thread inserts installed.

Links

Metal Stitching

Metal stitching is a very well-established repair method. It is applicable to a wide variety of materials such as cast iron, cast steel and many non-ferrous metals.

View more

Thread Repair

The repair inserts that we use to repair damaged threads are super strong and do not create spreading forces. They are ideal for high-load applications.

View more

Metal Stitching a Fractured Engine Block from 1913

Pierce Arrow

This post describes the repair of a Pierce Arrow engine block from 1913. The Pierce Arrow was the largest production automotive engine at its time. The swept volume of this 6-cylinder, 48 hp (36 kW), engine amounts to a whopping 13’500 cc (824 cu in)!

This engine is of the T-head engine type, which is essentially an early form of crossflow engine. This design is characterized by two separate camshafts, one on either side of the cylinder. One camshaft operates the inlet valves and the other the exhaust valves. This makes this engine design quite complex and expensive to produce.

The main advantage of the T-head engine design is the fact that it is not at all prone to knocking – a condition where the gasoline vapour in the cylinder ignites too early by itself due to compression, before it is lit by the spark plug. Knocking was a big issue especially during the early decades of the 20th century, when gasoline sold typically had a very low Octane rating. T-head engines were therefore popular until about 1920, when better fuel became widely available. At that time, the disadvantages of the design started to outweigh the advantages.

A large piece had broken off the cast iron engine block and had to be reattached
A large piece had broken off the cast iron engine block and had to be reattached

The in-line 6-cylinder Pierce Arrow cast iron engine block that we received for repair at our workshop at Lock-N-Stitch in California, USA, was severely damaged. A large piece of the casting had been broken off at the block’s front (timing belt) end.

Our metal stitching specialists successfully reattached it. In order to do so, they installed about thirty Castmaster™ stitching pins over a total fracture length of 160 mm, in material with a thickness ranging from 12 – 16 mm. For additional strength, they also installed two high-strength locks perpendicular to the fracture line.

The fracture line passed through a hole for a positioning dowel pin. To repair that, our specialists first closed the hole by installing a solid Full Torque™ plug, before drilling it anew in the exact location.

Badly fractured engine block
The completed repair.
The completed repair.
Close-up of the fracture line
Close-up of the fracture line
Repair completed. Stitching pins, locks and Full Torque insert installed
Repair completed. Stitching pins, locks and Full Torque insert installed

Repairing a V12 Flathead Engine Block from 1934

Packard Twelve

We routinely work on museum pieces. In this post we introduce a typical case: The repair of a Packard Twelve engine block from 1934, carried out by our colleagues from Lock-N-Stitch in California.

As the name implies, the Packard Twelve is a 12-cylinder engine. It is a flathead engine, sometimes also called side-valve engine, where the intake and exhaust valves are contained within the engine block rather than within the cylinder heads. Flathead engines were very popular until the 1950s and were built in large numbers by automotive manufacturers. Their advantage is their simplicity, compactness, reliability and low cost as the flathead design obviates a complicated valve train. Such engines therefore need far less components than alternative designs such as, for example, single or double overhead camshaft arrangements.

The main disadvantage of the flathead engine is its relatively low efficiency and power output. The Packard Twelve V12 engine has a displacement of 7300 cc (445 cu in) and a maximum output of 119 kW (160 hp).

Engine block received with cracks in both longitudinal side walls and around the valve seats
Engine block received with cracks in both longitudinal side walls and around the valve seats
Repair finished
Repair finished. We stitched about 200 mm (8 inches) of cracks in this engine block.

Repair of cracks in the side walls of the engine block

When the engine block was delivered to us, it contained eleven cracks of various lengths. Some were small, others rather long. Added together, they amounted to a total length of 200 mm. In addition, the block suffered from corrosion and material loss around the camshaft spaces.

The cast iron block had been “repaired” before by arc welding. This has not been a great success – new, fairly large cracks could be seen extending to the left and right of the weld.

As they always so on cast iron parts on which someone has already been attempting a repair by welding, our specialists cut out all material in the vicinity of the weld, in the so-called heat affected zone. This is our standard operating procedure. Whenever cast iron is welded at, the heat from welding burns out the carbon, which constitutes between 2% and 4% of the cast iron. Once the carbon is burnt, the cast iron becomes hard and brittle, looses its structural integrity and becomes worthless.

To replace the cut out material on both longitudinal sides of the block, our specialists installed repair patches made of cast iron. They stitched them firmly in place with Castmaster™ stitching pins. Similar pins of various lengths and diameters were also used to repair the cracks found in various locations on the block, in material ranging from 3 – 10 mm thick. Some of these cracks are visible in the pictures below.

Our specialists also installed five Full Torque™ thread inserts to repair thread holes damaged by corrosion and erosion.

The engine block had been arc welded in the past. As expected, this did not solve the problem but led to further cracks extending left and right.
The engine block has been arc welded in the past. As expected, this did not solve the problem but led to further cracks extending to the left and right of the weld.
Crack extending leftward from the weld, serious corrosion at the edge of the sealing surface.
Crack extending leftward from the weld, serious corrosion at the edge of the sealing surface.
We removed the material that has previously been welded and installed a repair patch.
We removed the material that has previously been welded and installed a repair patch.
Crack extending rightward from the weld. Again, serious corrosion at the sealing surface.
Crack extending rightward from the weld. Again, serious corrosion at the camshaft cover sealing surface.
Installation of stitching pins to seal the crack
Installation of stitching pins to seal the crack
Skimming of cylinder head landing surfaces
Skimming of cylinder head landing surfaces
Left longitudinal side wall completed
Left longitudinal side wall completed
Right longitudinal side wall completed
Right longitudinal side wall completed

Repair of cracks around the valve pockets

A thorough magnetic particle inspection (MPI) of the block revealed hairline cracks between some of the valve seat and cylinder liner bores. We permanently repaired these cracks by installing small size stitching pins.

After completion of the repair, we took the opportunity to skim all cylinder head gasket mating surfaces, on the engine block as well as on the two cylinder heads.

Crack between valve seat and cylinder bore clearly visible during Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI)
Crack between valve seat and cylinder bore clearly visible during Magnetic Particle Inspection (MPI)
Cracks between valve seat and cylinder bores successfully repaired
Cracks between valve seat and cylinder bores successfully repaired
Another crack
Another crack, seen here under Ultraviolet (UV) light during MPI